Changes in mean bubble diameter with different frit pore sizes
Download scientific diagram | Changes in mean bubble diameter with different frit pore sizes (different letters in the bar graph indicates significant difference at p 6 0.01). from publication: Optimization of protein recovery by foam separation using response surface methodology | Response surface methodology was used to optimize conditions for protein recovery using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a model protein in a foam separation system. Factors examined were pore size, initial protein concentration, and airflow rate. The size of bubbles produced | Foam, Response Surface Methodology and Optimization | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.
Eco-efficient pickering foams: leveraging sugarcane waste-derived
The role of jet and film drops in controlling the mixing state of
Porous Sparger and Gas Sparger Manufacturer
Comparative study on compressional recovery performance of
Micro Sparger and Microsparger for Bioreactor Manufacturer
The Relationship among Pore-Size Ratings, Bubble Points, and Porosity
Giuseppe MAZZA, Founder & CSO, BSc, MSc, PhD, FCISFT, Commercialization of Extraction Technologies
Bubble size, d , and void fraction of gas vs liquid flow rate at
Salih AKSAY, Associate Professor, Doctor of Philosophy, Mersin University, Mersin, Department of Food Engineering
Biotechnology & Bioengineering, Biotechnology Journal
